Case Result: Not Guilty – Masked Armed Robbery, Subsequent Offense

May, 2018

Our attorneys represented a man accused of masked armed robbery, attempting to procure perjury, and witness intimidation in the Lowell Superior Court.

Allegations

The facts alleged by the prosecution and the police were that a man went into a cellphone store armed with a kitchen knife, wearing all black, with a t-shirt covering his face. The client was arrested a mile away running from the store with a large amount of cash in his pocket. One other person was arrested at the same time and told police that our client was the person who went into the store to commit the robbery. A third person, who was discovered by police a few days later, also stated that our client was the person who committed the robbery.

Punishment

Given the charges, if convicted the punishment for the most serious offense would be at least ten years in prison with the possibility of imprisonment for life.

Trial

At trial, we attacked the credibility of the two witnesses, who entered cooperation agreements with the prosecution in exchange for a promise not to be charged for their role in the robbery. We were able to expose their inconsistent stories, their past (and recent) drug use, their prior convictions, and promises made to them by the police.

Additionally, an eye witness who testified that our client had the knife on that day admitted on the stand that she mistook Attorney Sullivan for the prosecutor because “her mind played a trick on her.” Knowing that the judge would be instructing the jury as to the problems with any eyewitness identification, we were able to elicit this information from the prosecution witness to show the problems with eyewitness identification testimony.

Finally, we were able to highlight that crucial DNA and fingerprint evidence collected suggested that it was not our client who had committed the robbery according to the government’s own witnesses. The item that was alleged to be the mask that was used in the robbery did not contain the client’s DNA, there was a fingerprint on the getaway car that did not match the client’s print, and the store was not tested for prints or DNA analysis.

The trial lasted six days, with five days of testimony from thirteen witnesses called from the government. We originally retained the services of an expert in eyewitness identification to assist in the defense (Doctor Ayanna Thomas), but as the case got closer to trial and the theory of defense became more defined, we made the strategic decision not to call any witnesses and only attack the government’s evidence. The strategy proved well founded and the jury decided the verdict in less than two hours.

Result

Our client was found not guilty of all counts. It was remarkable to see the client and his family able to embrace in celebration. Their long journey ended with a positive result.